Arcos Ricardo - Rubin Museum Project
Ricardo
Arcos
Professor
Dana Trusso
HUP
105
03
April 2017
Rubin Museum
Artwork
When
I visited the Rubin Museum I was surprised to see that there were 2 displays of
the Bhavachakra. One of them was an old and small painting on cloth piece, and
the other was a much bigger and newer print. Both pieces of artwork had a large
circle in the middle that was being held by a large demon. The amount of detail
inside the circle the demon was holding hinted to me that there was a lot of
meaning within the drawings. And I wanted to learn more.
The Bhavachakra is also
known as The Wheel of Life. In an archived article in bbc.com, I found that The Bhavachakra is categorized as a “mandala”,
which is an intricate representation of Buddhist view of the world. So by that
logic I would argue that The Wheel of Life is the way Buddhist look at what
life is. The article then goes to explain each section of the piece. “The Wheel
is divided into five or six realms, or states, into which a soul can be reborn.”
This would explain why the main shape of the artwork is a circle. For
Buddhists, life is a cycle of rebirth, life, and death. The goal of a Buddhist
is to escape said cycle (Fisher 75). The BBC article then goes to explain: “In
the middle of the Wheel are the three causes of all suffering. These are known
as the Three Fires: they are greed, ignorance and hatred, represented by a
rooster, a pig and a snake.” It is important to note that the fact that the Three
Fires are indeed at the center of the image. This implies that these “fires”
are the source of what is around them, or that they are the point of origin (Fisher
76). Towards the edge of the Wheel we can see the Twelve Stages of Dependent
Origination. The article tells that “Buddhism has no creator god to explain the
origin of the universe […] The Buddha taught that this was a 12-stage process -
a circular chain, not a straight line. Each stage gives rise to the one
directly after it.” However, these philosophies are part of this mandala and
not just the beings inside the Wheel. They are the outer edge of the Wheel of
Life. It leads me to believe that they can be used to represent reality. Maybe
the universe doesn’t have an ultimate creator; it exists as an unending chain
of dependencies that always was and always will be. Coming full circle, pun
intended, we get back to the demon holding the entire Wheel. “Yama symbolizes
the impermanence of everything. The beings he holds are trapped in eternal
suffering by their ignorance of the nature of the universe.” That’s why in the
Bhavachakra we can often see Buddha sitting outside of the Wheel. He has
escaped this cycle and teaches that through the eightfold path anyone can
obtain liberation from the Wheel (Fisher 75).
Does one become a God
if they achieve Buddhahood? Well, depends on how we define godhood within
Buddhism. In the PBS documentary The
Buddha, by David Grubin, there are instances were Buddha himself is shown
as imperfect. Buddha made mistakes in his life before and after achieving
enlightenment. There is even an interview within the film where the Dalai Lama explains
that Buddha needed “hard work” to achieve his goals. Buddha wasn’t omnipotent
or a perfect being. Can Buddha be considered a god? And if not, what else? Is
Buddhism a religion if it doesn’t have a god? I would argue yes. Even if
Buddhism doesn’t have a classical god in Buddha it is still very much so like
other religions. Religions works on faith; and Buddhism is no different.
Whether or not Buddha can be considered a god or otherwise, it does not change
the fact that faith is the foundation of Buddhist practices. We cannot objectively
claim that life is a never ending cycle; or for that matter, that any of
Buddha’s teachings hold any truths. Whenever you see a monk meditation or
chanting a mantra, you are witnessing an act of faith on Buddhist doctrines;
just as when you see a Christian go to church or pray you can argue that said
Christian is practicing religion. These doctrines and practices are meant for
people to unite under a philosophy and attempt to tackle the hardships of
existence. How is Buddhism any different? If anything, if we assume that
religions are created by people for people, then isn’t the idea of Buddha
rising from a mere human to become the leader of Buddhism not a way to imply
that it is a religion even more so than others with omnipotent gods? Buddhism
may not have a God like Abrahamic religions, and it even has radical
philosophies that make it stand out within the world or religion, but I argue
that the effects of Buddhism are very real and of similar nature to that of
other big religions. There is no need for a new “tag” for Buddhism, it is very
much so a religion.
Visiting the Rubin
Museum helped me grasp what exactly is a religion. As a person born as a
Christian, I used to think that religion was about God. Even that religion
might be about the things that we are supposed to be doing and avoiding to do.
Now I understand that religion can have multiple purposes but they all fall
within one big purpose. Religion is about people trying to understand life.
They are meant as ways to be at peace with the madness that is been thrown into
existence and trying to figure it all out. Religions aren’t about gods or what
is right or wrong; religions are about people trying to deal with reality.
Buddhism is just a religion about imperfect people trying to deal with an imperfect
and painful world.
Required selfie:
#1
Title: Buddha
Shakyamuni
Date: 14th
Century
Doctrine: When
the demon Mara challenged Siddhartha Guatama, the soon to be Buddha reached
down and touched the earth. With his gesture, he answered Mara the very earth
is his witness. Mara vanished and the Buddha came to be. Siddhartha had
realized that the earth, the very universe, and he were all part of nature.
There was no separation between them. By reaching Nirvana, the Buddha
understood the nature of reality.
#2
Title: Stories
of Previous Lives of Buddha
Date: 17th
Century
Doctrine: Buddha
is the ultimate goal and being in Buddhism. Yet, he is no god. Just like us,
Buddha was once trapped within Samsara. As shown in this piece of art, Buddha
lived many lives as a regular living being. He even made mistakes even in his human
life as a Buddha but seen this image reminds me of the non-theistic nature of
Buddhism. Anyone can become a Buddha at any point. Buddhahood is within the
reach of every single living being. Buddhism is not about Buddha been a God but
about the process of becoming and teachings of Buddha.
#3
Title: The Great
Stupa of Boudhanath
Date: 19th
Century
Doctrine: This
piece of art reminds me of the effort that the path to Nirvana, the Eightfold
Path, takes. This image depicts a large Stupa but with a great flight of stair.
However the real Boudhanath Stupa does not have such a large set of stairs. To
me this is an effort to imply that the process towards reaching liberation from
Samsara is meant to be a long and hard process. This could also be reinforced
by the choice of the artist of having the piece been embroidered. The same
image could have been made much easily as a painting but the artist chose to
work on silks as a way to communicate that a lot of effort is required to reach
Buddhahood.
#4
Title: Wheel of
Life
Date: 18th
Century
Doctrine: We are
all trapped in Samsara, but if we want to exit this endless cycle and achieve
Nirvana, then we need to learn how to grow spiritually. This piece of work
helps me visualize that. It gives me a new perspective, like an outside frame
of reference, to look at our lives at. We see our existence trapped inside the
circles, almost as if it’s saying “Look at how small your reality is, don’t you
want to break free from this cage?” We also can see both the results of good
and bad Karma and this can work to encourage us towards spiritual growth.
#5
Title: Buddha
Amitoyus
Date: 17th
Century
Doctrine: This artwork
shows the idea of Dukkha. To give someone a Buddha Amitoyus can be understood
as wishing someone a long life. But why do we wish such a thing? I believe it’s
because people have to face the fact that they aren’t eternal and it causes us
to experience Dukkha. But it’s not a bad thing to feel that way; we need
emotions like Dukkha, desires, and “wants” to strife for happiness.
Works Cited
"Religion & Ethics - In pictures: Buddhist
Wheel of Life." BBC. BBC, n.d.
Web. 28 May 2017.
"Religions - Buddhism: The Buddhist
universe." BBC. BBC, 23
Nov. 2009. Web. 28 May 2017.
Fisher, Mary
Pat. Living Religions: A Brief
Introduction, 2nd ed. Pearson, 2008.
The Buddha.
Directed by David Grubin, narrated by Richard Gere, PBS, 2010.






I would agree to that Buddhism can be perceived as a religion because it is a way of life like all religions. However, how can Buddhism be considered a religion without the presence of a "god" like deity? In Buddhism, Buddha doesn't consider himself a god, but a teacher and one who has attained enlightenment. When Buddha dies, does the faith of the buddhist go from Buddha to Buddha and so on? So, I do not believe Buddhism to be a religion.
ReplyDeleteI would argue that religion is not about a being like a teacher or a god, but that religion is about the ideas behind that entity. Buddhism didn't end with Buddha's death because his teachings live on to this day within Buddhist believers. It would be nonsense to think that religion needs to be tied to a being, it can be, however it is not necessary. If anything, think of Jesus's death; it is through his death that Christians regained a relationship with God. It wasn't so much about Jesus himself but about his teachings, ideas, and the meaning behind his actions.
DeleteBuddhism isn't about Buddha, it is about Buddha's teachings and philosophies helping people deal with the burden of existence. That is why I think that Buddhism is a religion.